@article{Poaquiza_Galarza_Quiroga_2020, title={COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVITY IN CRIMINAL ACTION}, volume={24}, url={https://uctunexpo.autanabooks.com/index.php/uct/article/view/301}, abstractNote={<p>In the development of this investigative document, it is intended to determine the incidence of the objectivity principle in the integral investigation of the criminal action in the sense of Art 5.21 of the Integral Organic Criminal Code, this principle clearly delimited and according to what is established in Art. 13.1 In this sense, it is recognized that the actions of prosecutors are prejudiced when issuing a plan to increase productivity, which in personal judgment lacks constitutional grounds, as this reality has given way to prosecutors subject to a qualification, accuse and exercise criminal action on most cases that come to their attention. The methodology applied in this study has a quantitative approach with a non-experimental type design and in turn deductive methods were applied. From the investigation, it has been possible to conclude that the tax investigation is not carried out comprehensively, since it is not carried out in accordance with the principle of objectivity established in Art. 5. 21 of the Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code, which affects fundamentals Constitutional as the right to defense and due process, since the prosecutors to comply with statistics or qualifications in their exercise, seek to collect most of the elements of charge to be able to impute the accused, leaving aside the investigation in order to collect elements of discharge.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Due Process, Right to Defense, Fiscal Instruction, Integral Investigation, Principle of Objectivity.</p> <p>References</p> <p>[1]Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador, Código Orgánico Integral Penal, Quito: CEP, 2014.</p> <p>[2]Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador, Código Orgánico Integral Penal, Quito: No. SAN-2014-0138, 2014.</p> <p>[3]D. Benavente, Derecho Procesal, Chile: Jurídica, 2015.</p> <p>[4]D. Hechandía, Estudio de Derecho Procesal, Bogotá: ABC, 2016.</p> <p>[5]V. Solano, «El neoconstitucionalismo. Una definicion y una taxonomia latinoamericana,» Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho, vol. 5, pp. 161-172, 2016.</p> <p>[6]E. Vescovi, Los recursos judiciales y demás medios de impugnativo en Iberoamerica, Argentina: Palma, 2014.</p> <p>[7]M. Saldaña, M. Quezada and A. Durán, «Estudio de la notificación del inicio de la indagación previa y la legitimidad del proceso penal,» Revista Universidad y Sociedad, vol. 11, nº 5, pp. 396-404, 2019.</p> <p>[8]E. Durán, Dictamenes Fiscales, Quiro: Voluntad, 2016.</p> <p>[9]O. D. Villema Castilo, Justicia y Libertad, Quito: Colón, 2016.</p> <p>[10]D. Falcone, «Apuntes sobre la formalización de la investigación desde la perspectiva del objeto del proceso penal,»</p&gt;}, number={100}, journal={Universidad Ciencia y Tecnología}, author={Poaquiza, Angel and Galarza, Christian and Quiroga, Malena}, year={2020}, month={May}, pages={37-43} }