The authors must supply their products through the OJS platform, and they will be informed in a timely manner of the dates for their submission.
In principle, the study area, theme, format and relevance of the article will be taken into account, notifying the authors of the following:
1.- That the article has passed the peer review stage, considered experts in the article's study area. This process will last ten calendar days, taking into account the evaluation form present on the OJS platform. This evaluation will be in a double-blind mode for author (s) and evaluators, that is, that the article will be sent to the evaluators without the identity of the authors and any other data that refers to them, and in the same way will provide the authors with the observations without data from the evaluators. In the event that there is no consistency between the evaluations, a third evaluation will be considered, complying with the double-blind standard. The evaluators will carry out their work under the criteria of confidentiality and impartiality.
2.- That the article is rejected for not being of interest to the magazine or for presenting a format that is not the one established by the Magazine.
Once the article has been evaluated, the authors will be notified:
In cases where the article is already accepted, the authors must sign a declaration of originality and an authorization of the publication and reproduction rights of the same and of the inclusion in databases, web pages, or electronic pages, national or international ( Review Annex 1: Originality Declaration and Conflict of Interest Declaration formats). All the content of the articles, which includes texts, tables, figures, information in general, included in the material to be published is the sole responsibility of the authors. Likewise, the article is the responsibility of its authors and does not necessarily reflect the thinking of the editorial committee.
3.- That the article presents minor revisions that can be improved for subsequent publication. Likewise, the author / s will have 15 calendar days to return the article with the suggested corrections, accompanied by a letter stating the modifications made.
4.- That the article cannot be published because the modifications are so1.- That the article presents minor revisions that can be improved for its subsequent publication. Likewise, the author / s will have 15 calendar days to return the article with the suggested corrections, accompanied by a letter stating the modifications made.
The editorial committee will evaluate if the observations made have been complied with and if it considers it pertinent send it again to the evaluating peer. The publication decision will be subject to the agreement of the academic peer and the editorial committee, taking into account the observations made previously. In the case of not agreeing with the evaluations of the peers, the authors must send an explanatory letter justifying their position regarding the observations. The magazine reserves the right to edit the texts, without changing the meaning of the article.