Resumen
Este artículo analiza la diferencia entre la enseñanza y la práctica de las destrezas de comprensión oral y escrita en el contexto del aprendizaje del inglés como segunda lengua (ESL). Una revisión sistemática de la literatura examina estudios recientes publicados en los últimos cinco años sobre enfoques pedagógicos. Los resultados indican que la enseñanza activa, que incluye estrategias de identificación e inferencia de palabras clave, es significativamente más eficaz que la práctica repetitiva, ya que permite a los estudiantes aplicar estas destrezas con mayor eficacia en situaciones de la vida real. Se concluye que la enseñanza estructurada es clave para fomentar el aprendizaje en profundidad, mientras que la práctica no guiada puede limitar el desarrollo eficaz de estas destrezas.
Citas
[2] H. Atmowardoyo and G. Sakkir, "The Development of Language Learning Theory Based on Best Practice: A Literature Review," Atlantis Press, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 172-184, 2021.
[3] G . Pacheco, "Basic cognitive processes and reading comprehension in first-cycle students of the special education program, Faculty of Education, Arts and Communication, 2023-2024," 2024.
[4] N. García, "Reading comprehension as a technique of expression: Review of studies from Ecuador," Multidisciplinary Latin American Journal (MLAJ), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36-51, 2024.
[5] A. Stiths, "Is Mind-Reading a Unimodal Capacity? A Critical Review on the Discussion and Empirical Support of Theory-Theory (Tt) and Simulation Theory (St)," Principia an International Journal of epistemology, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 319–346, 2022.
[6] L. Echevarria, "Oral communicative competence in the mother tongue for the development of learning: Systematic review," Horizontes Magazine, vol. 8, no. 34, pp. 1699-1713, 2024.
[7] D. García, "The use of comprehensible input in the English classroom: a critical review," 2024.
[8] L. Reyes, M. Cubillos, Z. Nieto, J. Cristancho and L. Useche, "Gamification in learning environments for teaching bilingualism, theoretical and methodological advances, and research trends: a systematic review 2018-2023," Mundo FESC, vol. 13, no. 51, pp. 26-45, 2023.
[9] A. Sánchez, D. Arzola, and V. Ríos, "Approaches to the curriculum, teacher training and methodology in teaching and learning English: a review of the literature and analysis of results," Revista Eduación, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2022.
[10] R. Flores, Y. Huayta, A. Galindo, C. López, and J. Gutiérrez, "Phonological awareness in early reading: A systematic review," Culture, Education and Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61-74, 2021.
[11] C. Ramos, "A bibliometric analysis of academic literacy: a review of the state of the art, from the past to the future," Revista de Educación, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-99, 2021.
[12] P. Valera, M. Torres, M. Vásquez and G. Lescano, "English language learning through digital tools in higher education: systematic review," Horizontes Magazine, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 200-211, 2023.
[13] L. Rodríguez, "The importance of literature for teaching foreign languages in primary education," 2020.
