Keywords
stool
in vivo
moringa oleifera
How to Cite
Abstract
In vivo digestibility in Creole goats was evaluated with the feeding of whole diets whose forage base was the Moringa oleifera harvested 60 and 75 days. Five whole Creole goats of 24-36 months of age with an approximate live weight of 25-30 kg were used, a completely randomized design with two treatments and five repetitions was applied, the animals entered experimentation where 10 days of adaptation and 7 days were given Stool collection (in vivo technique), a proportional 25 % of feces was collected, for processing and respective laboratory analysis. DMS values (72,69 – 73,11 %); DPB (61,56 – 71,30 %) and DFB (78,64 – 73,27 %) for 60 and 75 days respectively, which did not show differences except for PB and FB values that were different (P < 0,05) the results obtained in this experiment are in the categorization parameters of excellent digestibility.key words.
Keywords: goats, stool, in vivo, moringa oleifera.
References
[1]GAD Manglaralto, “Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento territorial de la Parroquia Rural Manglaralto 2014-2019”, 2015. [En línea]. Available: http://app.sni.
gob.ec/sni-link/sni/PORTAL_SNI/data_sigad_plus/sigadplusdiagnostico/0968538230001_Diagn%C3%B3stico%202014-2019%20Parroquia%20Manglaralto_
26-10-2015_06-33-43.pdf. [Último acceso: 09 09 2019].
[2]B. Schneider and W. Flatt, “The evaluation of feeds though digestibility experiments”, The University of Georgia Press, pp. 151-168, 1975.
[3]A. Bondi, “Nutrición Animal”, Zaragoza: Acribia, 1989.
[4]Pérez, “Avanza validación de moringa como alternativa forrajera para ovinos”, Fundación Produce Sinaloa A.C, 2009.
[5]M. Lachmann and O. Araujo, “La estimación de la digestibilidad en ensayos con rumiantes”, Universidad de Zulia, Maestría. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinaria, 2000.
[6]I. García, J. Mora and R. Piñero, “Cuál es el efecto de la Moringa oleifera sobre la Dinámica”, Scielo, vol. 28, nº 1, p. 43, 2016.
[7]L. Maynard, J. Loosli, H. Hintz and R. Warner, «Procesos digestivos en diferentes especies animales” de Nutrición Animal, 4, Ed., México, Mc Grawn-Hill, 1989,
p. 34.
[8]M. D. Stern and W. H. Hoover, “Methods for determining and factors affecting rumen microbial protein synthesis”, J. Anim. Sci, pp. 590-1603, 1979.
[9]J. Clark, T. H. Klismeyer and M. R.Carmeron, “Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows”, J. Dairy Sci., pp. 2304-2323, 1992.
[10]R. Herrera-Saldana, R. Gomez, M. Torabi and J. Huber, “Influence of synchronizing protein and starch degradation in the rumen on nutrient utilization and microbial protein synthesis”, J. Dairy Sci, pp. 142-148, 1990.