Keywords
organizational commitment
continuous improvement
How to Cite
Abstract
The perspective of an organization is its continuous improvement, conditioned by the factors of the perception and characteristics of the employees, as well as the actions of the institution. The objective of this article is to know the incidence of the work environment in the organizational commitment of the workers of the Regional Agrarian Directorate of Amazonas, 2019. The study is quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational. The survey was applied to a group of 95 collaborators, the results showed that there is a dependency relationship identified according to the Pearson correlation of 0.564; with a significance level of 0.001. In this sense, we can indicate that the work environment is directly related to organizational commitment, in such a way that the greater the organizational commitment, the better the work environment, highlighting two aspects at work, such as interpersonal relationships and working conditions, which lead to growth and institutional development.
Keywords: Work environment, organizational commitment, continuous improvement.
References
[2] C. Guillén Gestoso and R. Guil Bozal, Psicología del trabajo para relaciones laborales, 10th ed. España: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
[3] L. Teresa, S. Rivas, U. Del Autónoma, D. Estado, and M. Hidalgo, “El clima y el compromiso organizacional en las organizaciones,” Rev. Int. La Nueva Gestión Organ., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 120–127, 2009.
[4] P. Fricke and A. Etzioni, “A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations.,” Polit. Sci. Q., vol. 91, no. 2, p. 341, 1976, doi: 10.2307/2148419.
[5] R. Hall, Organizaciones. Estructuras, procesos y resultados, 3rd ed. México: Prentice Hall Internacional, 1996.
[6] N. Betanzos Díaz and F. Paz Rodríguez, “Análisis psicométrico del compromiso organizacional como variable actitudinal,” An. Psicol., vol. 23, pp. 207–215, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/22411.
[7] A. Verma, R. T. Mowday, L. Porter, and R. M. Steers, Employee-Organization Linakges: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, vol. 38, no. 2. Sciece Direct, 1982.
[8] J. R. Gordon, Comportamiento organizacional, 5th ed. España: Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana, 1997.
[9] D. Hellriegel and J. W. Slocum, Comportamiento organizacional, 12th ed. México DF: Cengage Learning, 2009.
[10] C. Bayona Sáez, S. Goñi Legaz, and C. Madorrán García, “Compromiso organizacional: implicaciones para la gestión estratégica de los recursos humanos,” Rev. Eur. Dir. y Econ. la Empres., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 139–149, 2000.
[11] S. P. Robbins, Comportamiento Organizacional, 10th ed. México DF: Pearson Educación, 2004.
[12] Library, “Clima organizacional según la teoría de Litwin y Stringer: El Concepto de Clima Organizacional,” 2018. https://1library.co/article/teoría-litwin-stringer-teorias-clima-organizacional.q23mr2pz (accessed Mar. 26, 2022).
[13] D. R. Denison, H. Serna Gómez, and J. Villamizar Herrera, Cultura corporativa y productividad organizacional, 3rd ed. Bogotá: Legis, 1991.
[14] I. Chiavenato, Administracion de Recursos Humanos. El capital humano de las organizaciones, 9th ed. México DF:Mc Graw Hill Educación, 2011.
[15] A. Gonçalves, “Dimensiones del Clima Organizacional,” 2005. http://www.geocities.ws/janethqr/liderazgo/130.html (accessed Mar. 16, 2022). ISSN-E: 2542-3401, ISSN-P: 1316-4821 Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología, vol.26, Núm. 114, (pp. 60-71) Polo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.