Abstract
This study investigated the influence of teachers’ educational leadership on the self-regulation learning process of the first-semester university students of the Social Communication and Journalism program in a higher education institution in Colombia. Nonexperimental quantitative methodology and transactional correlational design were employed wherein the MLQ and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire were used. The data collected were analyzed, thus revealing that for the educational leadership variable, the transformational leadership style presented the highest percentage of participation among teachers, and for the self-regulation learning variable, it was found that students do use self-regulation strategies.
Keywords: Self-regulated learning, educational leadership, transformational leadership theory, academic achievement.
References
[2] G. Vela, T. Cáceres, A. Vela, H. Gamero. “Liderazgo pedagógico en Arequipa-Perú: Competencias directivas”. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVI(2), 376– 400. 2020.
[3] R. Heck, P. Hallinger. “Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement”, The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 5, 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.013. 2010.
[4] O. González, L. González. “Estilos de liderazgo del docente universitario. Multiciencias”, 12(1), 35–44. 2020.
[5] K. Leithwood, J. Sun. “The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research”. Educational administration Quarterly, 3, 387. 2012.
[6] S. Ninković, F. Knežević. “Transformational school leadership and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of perceived collective teacher efficacy”. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 49–64. 2018.
[7] M. Meza, I. Flores. “El liderazgo transformacional en el trabajo docente: Colegio Mier y Pesado, un estudio de caso”. Revista Educación, 1, 101. 2014
[8] B. Zimmerman. “Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects”. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. 2008.
[9] P. Rosário, J. Núñez, J. González, A. Valle, L. Trigo, C. Guimarães. “Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: A narrative-based program assessed in the Iberian Peninsula”. European Journal of Psychology Of Education, 4, 411. 2010.
[10] J. Navas, F. Soriano, T. Holgado, M. Jover. “Las metas múltiples: Análisis predictivo del rendimiento académico en estudiantes chilenos”. Educación XX1, (1), 267. 2016.
[11] M. Boekaerts, L. Corno, P. Karoly, S. Maes, “Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention”. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231, 2005.
[12] E. Panadero, J. Tapia. “Teorías de autorregulación educativa: una comparación y reflexión teórica”. Psicología Educativa, 20(1), 11–22. 2014.
[13] S. Paris, J. Byrnes, A. Paris. “Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners”. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, pp. 253–288. 2001.
[14] E. Panadero, J. Tapia. “How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning”. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450–462. https://doiorg.ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221, 2014.
[15] A. Bandura. “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review”, 84(2), 191–215.1977
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.