Keywords
citizen training
specialty principle
electoral processes
How to Cite
Abstract
Citizen participation is a vital element for building high-quality democracies. However, statistics suggest that a greater number of citizens reject the polyarchic system as the most efficient. This research guides its analysis in the main characteristics that evidence the electoral processes in Ecuador, as well as in the strategies of citizen formation that can be applicable to the national case. The methodology used adheres to a path of qualitative order, of a theoretical -
descriptive and documentary type, under an exhaustive review of the Ecuadorian jurisprudential regulations that support this document. Finally, the Ecuadorian actions in electoral matters should not be governed only by the Code of Democracy, but also by the Organic Code of the Judicial Function, increasing the jurisdictional power, and adding functions and powers to which it can be included by normative means. the counting of votes in the country.
Keywords: National Electoral Council, citizen training, specialty principle, electoral processes.
References
[2] V. Solano, “La relación entre funciones del estado,” Iuris, vol. 1, no. 17, pp. 87–102, 2018.
[3]El Universo, “La trilogía de Montesquieu,” Opinión El Universo, 2012. https://www.eluniverso.com/2012/12/25/1/1363/trilogia-montesquieu.html/.
[4] R. Andrade, “El sistema electoral ecuatoriano en un estado garantista,” Rev. Derecho Elect., vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 161–191, 2018.
[5] D. Atamaint, E. Pita, J. Cabrera, and E. Acero, “Guía Miembros de Juntas Receptoras del Voto,” Quito, 2021.
[6] K. A. Garzón Sherdek and S. M. Cahuasquí Cevallos, “Sistema electoral ecuatoriano, ¿concentrador o proporcional?: una aproximación crítica a las reformas del 2019-2020,” Estado comunes, Rev. políticas y Probl. públicos, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 17–36, 2021, doi: 10.37228/estado_comunes.v1.n12.2021.208.
[7] Asamblea Nacional, Ley Orgánica Electoral y de Organizaciones Políticas de la República del Ecuador. Código de la Democracia. Ecuador, 2009, pp. 1–100.
[8] S. Basabe, “Civil society and political representation in Latin America (2010-2015): Towards a divorce between social movements and political parties?,” in Civil Society and Political Representation in Latin America, Adrián Alb., Springer International Publishing, Ed. Quito: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO, 2018, pp. 149–165.
[9] El Comercio, “La lenta evolución de los derechos electorales en el Ecuador,” Quito, pp. 1–7, Feb. 06, 2021.
[10] B. Franco, “Los escrutinios: Mecanismo y control,” Stockholm, 2007. doi: 10.1057/9780230271340_35.
[11] J. Pérez, “Reformas y retos de la gobernanza electoral,” Scielo Prepr., vol. 17, no. 1–16, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2916.
[12] A. Monsiváis, “La desafección representativa en América Latina,” Andamios, Rev. Investig. Soc., vol. 14, no. 35, p. 17, 2017, doi: 10.29092/uacm.v14i35.570.
[13] G. Giraldo, “Ciudadanía : aprendizaje de una forma de vida,” Educ. y Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 76–92, 2015, doi: 10.5294/edu.2015.18.1.5.
[14] C. Orellana et al., “Formación ciudadana y participación política en jóvenes de la Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile,”Civilizar, vol. 15, no. 28, p. 119, 2015, doi: 10.22518/16578953.283.
[15] A. Stefanny, “Autonomía de los Óeganos Electorales,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 6(11), 951–952., pp. 1–74, 2017.
[16] J. M. Ceballos, “NULIDAD ELECTORAL EN LA MERITOCRACIA ¿ UN ACCESO EFECTIVO A LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DE JUSTICIA,” ACADEMIA, 2017.
[17] P. Karla, “La Gobernanza Electoral en Ecuador,” 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.