Keywords
educational gaps
teaching strategies
neurolinguistic programming
How to Cite
Abstract
The research addresses the challenge of improving reading comprehension in high school students, considering educational gaps. The "Leo y comprendo" program was implemented in an educational institution using a quantitative approach and a quasi-experimental design. This program develops didactic reading comprehension strategies enhanced with principles of Neurolinguistic Programming. The population consisted of fourth-grade high school students from Piura in Peru, with a non-probabilistic sample. Data collection was conducted through reading comprehension tests with 20 questions. The results indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control group. In conclusion, the program demonstrated a significant effect in improving reading comprehension, supported by statistical analysis. The research highlights the relevance of specific strategies for addressing reading comprehension in educational settings.
References
[2] C. Snow, Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D Program in reading comprehension, RAND Corporation, 2002.
[3] G. Catalá, M. Catalá, E. Molina, and R. Monclús, Evaluación de la comprensión lectora: pruebas ACL (primero-sexto de primaria). Barcelona: Graó, 2001.
[4] R. D. Cervantes-Castro, J. A. Pérez-Salas, and M. D. Pérez-Salas, "Niveles de comprensión lectora. Sistema conalep: caso específico del plantel n° 172, de ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, en alumnos del quinto semestre," Rev. Internac. SOCIOTAM, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 73-114, 2017.
[5] I. Solé, Estrategias de lectura: Materiales para la innovación educativa, Editorial Graó, 2004.
[7] Ministerio de Educación, Currículo Nacional de la Educación Básica, Ministerio de Educación. Lima, 2016.
[8] D. Pearson and D. Stephens, "Learning about literacy: A 30-year journey," en H.Singer & B. Rudell (Eds.), pp. 22-103, Newark, Delaware: IRA & Erlbaum, 1994.
[9] M. Makuc, "Teorías implícitas de los profesores acerca de la comprensión de textos," Revista Signos, vol. 41, no. 68, pp. 403-422, 2008.
[10] T. Colomer and A. Camps, Enseñar a leer, enseñar a comprender, Madrid: Celeste Ediciones, 1996.
[11] D. Ausubel, J. Novak, and H. Hanesian, "Psicología Educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo," 2° Ed., Trillas México, 1983.
[12] J. T. Guthrie and A. Wigfield, "Engagement and Motivation in Reading," en M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P.Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III, pp. 403-424, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2000.
[13] C. Anderson and D. Pearson, "A schema-theoric view of basic processes in reading comprehension," en P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, pp. 255-291, Nueva York: Longman, 1984.
[14] B. A. Furduescu, "NLP Methods Of Motivation: Metaprograms and Reframing," Holistica–Journal of Business and Public Administration, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 127-138, 2019.
[6] A. Sabalete-García, La taxonomía de Barret como metodología en la comprensión lectora, Universidad de Jaen, 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.