SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BANANA SECTOR OF THE PROVINCE OF LOS RÍOS: A MEASUREMENT STUDY BASED ON THE CARROLL MODEL
PDF
HTML

Keywords

ISO 26000
factor analysis
measurement reliability

How to Cite

Saltos-Cruz, G., Guamán-Guevara, D., Reyes-Bedoya, D., & Villalba-Orozco, A. (2020). SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BANANA SECTOR OF THE PROVINCE OF LOS RÍOS: A MEASUREMENT STUDY BASED ON THE CARROLL MODEL. Universidad Ciencia Y Tecnología, 24(97), 4-10. Retrieved from https://uctunexpo.autanabooks.com/index.php/uct/article/view/266

Abstract

Social responsibility is established as the responsibility of companies in relation to the influence of their decisions in society and the environment. Therefore, this environment is established by the ISO 26000 standard with seven study edges (1) governance of the organization, (2) human rights, (3) labor practices, (4) environment, (5) fair practices, ( 6) consumer issue and (7) active participation and community development. The objective of this study is to design a social responsibility measurement instrument based on the ISO 26000 standard for agricultural sectors of banana production. This research is based on the theoretical inductive-deductive method, the empirical method of collecting information and a statistical procedure of factor analysis. The construct is checked based on the seven factors proposed by the theories studied. The statistics are: Cronbach's alpha 0.754, chi square 1644.521, degrees of freedom 20 and significance 0.000. In contrast to the [1] study, which suggests other dimensions, it is concluded that the items of the ISO 26000 standard are correlated to the proposed construct. In addition, the instrument is validated with high internal consistency for application in companies in the banana sector.

Keywords: ISO 26000, factor analysis, measurement reliability.

References

[1]Y. Bermúdez, «La responsabilidad social empresarial en la pequeña y mediada empresa: una aproximación a un modelo teórico,» Ingeniería y Sociedad UC, vol. 12, nº 2, pp. 1-12, 2017.

[2]C. Acurio, Aspectos socioeconómicos del sector agrícola y su relación con la creación de empresas populares y solidarias, cantón Quevedo, periodo 2012-2014, Quevedo: Universidad Estatal del Quevedo, 2015.

[3]W. Briones, F. Morales and F. Bajaña, «Gestión financiera desde la competitividad de las agr´ıcolas de un grupo bananero en las provincias de Guayas y Los Ríos,» Revista de ciencia e investigación, vol. 2, nº 8, pp. 16-21, 2017.

[4]M. Porter and M. Kramer, «Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility,» Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, nº 12, pp. 78-92, 2006.

[5]M. Gómez, «La gestión y la información sobre la responsabilidad social empresarial de las responsabilidad social empresarial de las PyMEs: la necesidad de
diferenciación,» Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia, vol. 56, pp. 15-40, 2010.

[6]L. Romero, D. Católico and L. Wanumen, «Revelación de lineamientos sobre responsabilidad social en los códigos de buen gobierno de las empresas cotizadas en Colombia,» revelación de la rse en códigos de buen gobierno, vol. 15, nº 38, pp. 599-624, 2014.

[7]L. Martínez, «La Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en las instituciones educativas,» Estudios sobre educación, vol. 27, pp. 169-191, 2014.

[8]W. Andía, «La responsabilidad social: análisis del enfoque de ISO 26000,» Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, vol. 18, nº 2, pp. 55-60, 2015.

[9]O. Ocampo, J. García , L. Ciro and Y. Forero, «Responsabilidad social en pequeñas empresas del sector de Alimentos y Bebidas de Caldas,» Entramado, vol. 11, nº 2, pp. 72-90, Julio-Diciembre 2015.

[10]F. Ganga and J. Vera, «El gobierno corporativo: consideraciones y cimientos teóricos,» Cuad. Adm. Bogotá, vol. 21, nº 35, pp. 93-126, 2008.

 

PDF
HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.