Payment Fintech: acceptance analysis based on TAM model
PDF
HTML

Keywords

fintech
financial technologies
payment systems
technology acceptance model

How to Cite

Leon AguagalloL. C., & Medina ChicaizaR. P. (2022). Payment Fintech: acceptance analysis based on TAM model. Universidad Ciencia Y Tecnología, 26(113), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.47460/uct.v26i113.575

Abstract

Developing continuous innovation actions for buying and selling processes has been one of the main challenges of commercial companies after the COVID-19 pandemic, in this sense, more and more companies adopt FinTech for payments, the research employs an exploratory level that analyzes the level of acceptance that these solutions have had. As a case study, the Technology Acceptance Model TAM was applied to a group of companies dedicated to the retail sale of electrical households in Ambato-Ecuador, that have already adopted FTP solutions. Among the results, it is confirmed that there is: a positive correlation between the five study variables (Use of the system, Perception of usefulness, Ease of use, Administrative Support, and Quality of the system), a medium degree of acceptance among entrepreneurs, and it is considered the need to promote more information about their use to generate social acceptance.

Keywords: Fintech, Financial technologies, Payment systems, Payment Digitalization, Technology Acceptance Model.

https://doi.org/10.47460/uct.v26i113.575
PDF
HTML

References

[1]Financiera Funcas-KPMG, “Fintech, innovación al servicio del cliente”, 2017. Consultado: abr. 17, 2021. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/33PAgkB.
[2]E. Noya, “¿Es el ‘fintech’ el mayor desafío que afronta la banca? ”, Harvard Deusto Bus. Rev., pp. 22–29, 2016, Consultado: abr. 09, 2021. [En línea]. Disponible
en: https://bit.ly/3fXhICU.
[3]L. Bravo y J. Urgilés, “Estudio general de vigilancia tecnológica: Fintech”, Revista CONNECT, pp. 1–16, 2020.
[4]UTEG, “El auge del comercio electrónico en Ecuador. Universidad Tecnológica Empresarial de Guayaquil”, sep. 28, 2020. http://bit.ly/3127etg (consultado
mar. 22, 2021).
[5]UEES. y CECE., “Primer estudio de comportamiento de compra por Internet en Ecuador”, 2017. Consultado: mar. 22, 2021. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/3cTE597.
[6]UEES. y CECE, “Transacciones electronicas en Ecuador durante el Covid-19”, 2020. Consultado: mar. 22, 2021. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/2QkG12Q.
[7]F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, vol. 13, núm. 3, pp. 1–23, 1989.
[8]Y. Leong, “A Test of the Technology Acceptance Model in Database Application: MS Access Use”, pp. 1–24, 2001, [En línea]. Disponible en: https://bit.
ly/3mksrd5.
[9]O. Guersent, “La transformación digital de los instrumentos de pago”, Papeles Econ. Española, núm. 149, pp. 58–61, 2016, Consultado: abr. 17, 2021. [En línea].
Disponible en: https://bit.ly/32i41do.
[10]I. Lee y Y. J. Shin, “Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges”, Bus. Horiz., vol. 61, núm. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.
2017.09.003.
[11]P. Medina y L. León, “Procedimiento metodológico para la implementación de soluciones FinTech en PYMEs de comercio”, Rev. Arbitr. Interdiscip. Koinonía,
vol. 4, núm. 8, pp. 394–426, 2019.
[12]F. Íñiguez, “Regulación para las fintech en el Ecuador”, Estud. la Gestión. Rev. Int. Adm., núm. 9, pp.109–134, feb. 2021, doi: 10.32719/25506641.2021.9.5.
[13]SRI, “Catastros del Régimen Único de Contribuyentes (RUC)”, 2021.
[14]F. Mochammad y A. Nouf, “Adoption of e-payment system to support health social security agency”, Int. J.Data Netw. Sci., vol. 5, núm. 4, pp. 737–744, 2021, doi:
10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.7.007.
[15]R. Peterson, “A Meta-Analisys of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha”, J. Consum. Res., vol. 21, pp. 381–391, 1994.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.